•  
  •  
 

Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal

Abstract

This article examines the importance of the competent implementation of pedagogical technologies by the teacher, also gives the concept of pedagogical assessment and describes the importance of its application, in the context of democratization of the educational process. The difference between grade and grade is highlighted. A brief description of the styles of pedagogical communication is given, where the democratic style is the most favorable for teaching. Also, the characteristic of the psychological characteristics of the child of the middle school period is given. This work is supported by research on the effect of the mark on the child and a summary of the results of it.

First Page

299

Last Page

310

References

[1]. Amonashvili Sh. A. Training. Grade. Mark. M.: Knowledge, 1980.

[2]. Ananiev BG Psychology of pedagogical assessment. L.: Science, 1935.

[3]. Assessment of educational achievements of students.

[4]. Bogdanov I.V. Psychology and Pedagogy: Electronic resource.

[5]. Burova IV Technologies of upbringing interaction and the organization of upbringing work: a tutorial. Nizhny Novgorod, 2013.

[6]. Demidova M.Yu. A system of measuring materials for evaluating metasubject results. — Moscow: Pero Publishing House, 2013.

[7]. Federal state educational standard of basic general education. / Ministry Education and Science of the Russian Federation. — M .: Education, 2010

[8]. Fuente, M. J. d. l. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 263-295. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/85635990?accountid=12249

[9]. Klimov EA Individual style of activity depending on the typological properties of the nervous system. Kazan, 1969.

[10]. Zhigalev BA System for assessing the quality of vocational education in a linguistic university: dissertation of Dr. Ped. Sciences: 13.00.08. Shuya, 2012.404 p.

[11]. Fuente, M. J. d. l. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 263-295. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/85635990?accountid=12249

[12]. Grammar of the Uzbek language. - Tashkent. Fan. 1975.Galperin I.R. Stylistics - M., 1977.

[13]. Bloomfield L. An Introduction to the study of Language. N.Y. 1914 p Buranov J.B, Yusupov U.K, Mskulov M.T, SodikoV A.S. The grammatical structure of Engish, Uzbek and Russian. Tashkent, Ukituvchi PH, 1986.

[14]. Harper, D. O. (1987). The creation and development of educational computer technology. In R. M. Thomas & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Educational technology: its creation, development and crosscultural transfer, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 35-63.Visscher, A., Wild, P., Smith, D., & Newton, L. (2003).

[15]. Evaluation of the implementation, use and effects of computerized management information system in English secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (3), 357-366.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.