•  
  •  
 

Review of law sciences

Abstract

This article analyzes the procedural features of the trial of inheritance disputes. In particular, the difference between these types of cases from other civil cases, that is, the admissibility of procedural succession in the consideration of cases of inheritance, the mandatory participation of all adult heirs in the case, the consideration of such categories of cases in a lawsuit and special order. The article also analyzes judicial practice and court statistics related to the trial of succession cases. And also, the problematic issues arising in the course of judicial proceedings on inheritance cases were considered and proposals and recommendations for their elimination were put forward.

DOI

10.24412/2181-1148-2020-1-65-69

References

1. X.Yodgorov. O‘zbekistonda so‘nggi 9 oy ichida meros bilan bog‘liq qancha ish ko‘rib chiqilgani ma’lum qilindi // https://kun.uz/51013045 2. X.Yodgorov. O‘zbekistonda so‘nggi 9 oy ichida meros bilan bog‘liq qancha ish ko‘rib chiqilgani ma’lum qilindi // https://kun.uz/51013045 3. Sudning hal qiluv qarorini tuzish bo‘yicha amaliy qo‘llanma // X. Yodgorov, M. Gulomova, G. Parpiyeva - Toshkent: Baktria press, 2016 - 196 b. - B.183-185. 4. R.Yu.Zakirov, Ya. S. Grishina, M. M. Maxmutova. Nasledstvennoye pravo. - M.: Yurist’, 2005. - S.307. 5. Yaneva R.R. Osobennosti rassmotreniya sudami del, svyazannix s nasledovaniyem. Avtoreferat. Moskva - 2009. - S.15. 6. Aminjanova M.A. Odil sudlovni ta’minlashga doir fuqarolik protsessini takomillashtirishning ayrim masalalari // Fuqarolik sud ishlarini yuritishga oid qonunchilikni takomillashtirishning nazariy va amaliy masalalari. Ilmiy-amaliy konferentsiya materiallari / Mas’ul muharrir yu.f.n., dots. A.B.G‘afurov. 1. “Adabiyot uchqunlari”. - T., - 2015. - B. 80 2.Svetkova Yu.V. Mirovoe soglashenie v arbitrajnom sudebnom prosesse. // Mariyskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2007. № 5. – S. 199–201. 3.Oqyulov O. Xo‘jalik prosessual qonunchiligini takomillashtirish muammolari. Monografiya. – T.: TDYuI, 2011. – B. 62. 4.Knyazev D.V. Mirovoe soglashenie v arbitrajnom prosesse. – Tomsk, 2004. – B.24. 5.Moiseev S.V. Prinsip dispozitivnosti arbitrajnogo prosessa. – Moskva, avtoref. diss... kand. yurid. nauk. – 2001. – S. 18. 6.Kochergin K.V. Utverjdenie mirovix soglasheniy v arbitrajnix sudax appelyasionnoy i kassasionnoy instansiy // Arbitrajniy i grajdanskiy prosess. – 2010. – № 1. 7.Kul'kova N.S. Pravovaya priroda mirovogo soglasheniya. Gosudarstvo i pravo v XXI veke. – 2013, Vipusk № 2, – S.2. 8.Qaxxorov J., Yusupov V. Kelishuv bitimining ahamiyati //O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy xo‘jalik sudi Axborotnomasi. 2013. №6, – B.39-40. 9.Toshkent viloyat xo‘jalik sudining 2016 yil 18 yanvar' 11-1535/14346-sonli ish materiallari. 10.Masadikov Sh.M. Sushnost' mediasii i problemi yeyo pravogo regulirovaniya v Respubliki Uzbekistan. Diss.kand.yurid.nauk. -Tashkent: TGYuI, 2008. – S. 156. 11.Akramova D. Primeritel'nie proseduri po xozyaystvennim delam. //O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy xo‘jalik sudi axborotnomasi. 2010 yil. №5. – B. 72–74.

Included in

Civil Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.