The article examines in detail an international treaty as a basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign interim measures, in addition, the author came to the conclusion that the Economic Procedural Legislation of Uzbekistan in chapter 33 of the EPC RU regulates proceedings in cases of recognition and enforcement of decisions of foreign courts and arbitrations, however, such foreign judicial acts as interim measures in any form are not regulated. In addition, the recently adopted legislation on international commercial arbitration - LRU 674 of February 16, 2021, despite the fact that its norms contain the regulation of interim measures in terms of prescribing interim measures and contains a reference to the execution of interim measures adopted by arbitration by state courts, does not provide for enforcement. This lies in the fact that, as mentioned earlier, the procedural legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan does not contain norms regulating the mechanism for the execution of foreign interim measures. Thus, it is necessary to provide for changes in the procedural legislation, since the new law provided for the relevance of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial acts, however, the current procedural legislation has not yet been brought into line.

Last Page



  1. The Regulation is a general legal act, which in all its elements is binding on all subjects of European law and is an act of direct effect, i.e. it is subject to application by the authorities and judicial institutions of all Member States, whether or not that State is in favor of their adoption. - European law. Editor-in-chief L.M. Entin. M.: Norma, 2001. С89.
  2. International conventions on the interaction of courts and judicial-legal cooperation in civil and commercial cases. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. Special supplement to No. 10, October 2000. P. 29-64.
  3. See further. Report on Convention//OJ of EC. 1990.No 189.P.38.
  4. Shak H. International civil procedural law. Translation from German M „2001.S.37-38.Case С 261/90. 26 March 1992, Report, I. 2149
  5. The issue of emergency jurisdiction is one of the ambiguous in the doctrine and practice of international civil procedure, while it is understood as jurisdiction, which is based on general signs of jurisdiction that go beyond, not recognized on an international scale. - See further. Shaq X. Dec. op. SL 95-196.
  6. PrelDoc. №lO. October 1998/HCPIL.
  7. IPRax 1999,240,Rn.4Q.
  8. Schlosser Report. 09.10.78.//OJEC 05,03.79.
  9. Prel.Doc. No. 1 O.October 1998./ HCPIL.
  10. Case С 125/79, 21 May 1980, Report, P. 1553
  11. Prel.Doc. No 10.Oct.1998. HCPIL.
  12. Voser N. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Interim Measures in Switzerland.//Intemational Litigation News.Jan. 1997.P.27. - Цит, по HCPIL/ Prel.Doc.No 10.Oct.l998.
  13. Prel.Doc. No 10.Oct.1998. HCPIL.
  14. JOCE, 1998.C.33 of January I998.P.20.
  15. Prei.Doc.NolO.Oct.1998/ HCPIL.
  16. Gazette of the SND and the Supreme Council of the RSFSR, 1992. No. 44. St. 2472.
  17. Official publication of the UN Information Center in Moscow. NY, 1973
  18. For example, Belgium. UK, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Egypt, Spain. Italy, Cuba, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Syria, Slovenia, France, Finland, Sweden.
  19. Gureev S.A. Conflict problems of maritime law. M., 1972; Ivanov G.G., Makovsky A.L. International private maritime law. L .: Shipbuilding,! 984; Ryabova E.V., Kheifets B.S. Jurisdiction of disputes in connection with maritime accidents. M., 1972; Fedchuk V.D. Means of preliminary legal protection of the property interests of maritime creditors in the law of England. Ph.D. M., 1990 and others.
  20. Under the auspices of the UN, a new draft of the International Convention on the Arrest of Sea Vessels was prepared and adopted at the UN Diplomatic Conference on the Arrest of Ships on March 12, 99 in Geneva (hereinafter referred to as the 1999 Convention rofla).//A/CONF. 188/6.19 March 1999. It is currently seeking ratification. This treaty clarifies and improves the 1952 Convention. The CTM RF in the section on the arrest of ships largely borrowed the norms of the 1999 Convention.
  21. The French are engaged in garratetv.//Rossiyskaya Gazeta. July 15, 2000 No. 136
  22. Boguslavsky MM. The practice of applying the principle of state immunity and the problem of legislative regulation.//CHP. Modern practice. M., 2000. С213-238.
  23. Remery J.P. Protection of foreign property and foreign investment: an example of seizure of Russian ships in France.//Legal protection of economic entities. Project No. HRRU 98Ol.Tasis 2000.C.44-52.
  24. Neshataeva T.N. On judicial immunities.//Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 1999. No. 9.S.56-63; Ushakov N.A. Jurisdictional immunities of states and their property. M., 1993;
  25. Khlestova I.O. Issues of state immunity in the legislation and contractual practice of the Russian Federation.//Problems of PIL. Ed. N.I. Marysheva.M.2000.S.68-85 and others.
  26. Gatenekaya L.N. Music and Law. Legal issues of international cooperation in the field of culture. L., Publishing house of Leningrad State University., 1987.
  27. Egorov L.M., Kolodkin A.L. Immunity of state sea vessels.//Proceedings of TsNIIMF.,19b8.Vyp.95.S.20-40.
  28. Legal guide to merchant shipping. Edited by Ph.D. A.S. Kokina. M.: 1998. C 282.
  29. European Convention "On Foreign Trade Arbitration" (1961, Geneva) // INSERVICE [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://www.inservice.ru/documents/euro-arb/. - Access date: 08/09/2021.
  30. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985)
  31. UNCITRAL Model Law "On International Commercial Arbitration" (1985, as amended in 2006)//UNCITRAL [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/russian/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-87000_Ebook-r.pdf. - Date of access: 12/16/2021.
  32. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On International Commercial Arbitration" dated February 16, 2021 https://lex.uz/docs/5294087?query=%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD : 08.09.2021
  33. Redfern A., Hunter M., Blackaby N. and Partasides C. The Role of National Courts During the Proceedings // Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration [Electronic resource]. - P. 7-22.
  34. Komarov AS Interim measures in international commercial arbitration // Economy and law. - 2004.-№4 (327). - C. 42-43.
  35. Danilevich A.S. International commercial arbitration: a course of lectures: v2h. - Minsk: Acad. management under the President of the Rep. Belarus, 2005. - S. 140 - 141
  36. Kobakhidze D.I. Regulation of interim measures in international commercial arbitration: a comparative analysis of the legislation of England, China and Russia. J: Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2017 pp. 87-92. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/regulirovanie-obespechitelnyh-mer-v-mezhdunarodnom-kommercheskom-arbitrazhe-sravnitelnyy-analiz-zakonodatelstva-anglii-kitaya-i Date of access: 09/18/2021
  37. Erpyleva N.Yu. International civil process: the main problems of modern development / Lawyer. 2004. N 2, 3 (February, March).
  38. Kasatkina A.S. International civil process M. 2018. S. 125-126. https://studme.org/222690/pravo/ obespechitelnye_mery_mezhdunarodnom_grazhdanskom_protsesse Accessed 21.09.2021
  39. Information letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated 07.07.2004 No. 78 “Review of the practice of applying preliminary interim measures by arbitration courts”.
  40. Kostin A.A. Some Aspects of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judicial Acts in the Arbitration Process of the Russian Federation // Russian Journal of Law. - 2014 - No. 3.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.