The following article is based on the action research done among English as foreign language (EFL) educators to identify the language assessment literacy level; hence, educational assessment has always been an integral element of teaching. The principle aim in undertaking the following research was to investigate the language assessment level of EFL teachers at Higher Educational Institutions (HEI) and mitigate the barriers to success in gaining procedural/ conceptual level of assessment literacy. There are many studies on language assessment literacy, taking the definition of assessment literacy as the root and focusing on the competence of language teachers, there exist several definitions. They will include a range of skills related to the test production, test score analysis, and the roles/ functions of assessment in education and society. The following research was undertaken with the help of two data collection methods: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative method helped to identify the perception of teachers the language testing and assessment and generate the answers. Test with authentic and contextualized scenarios was used as quantitative method. Both data helped to identify the level of teachers’ assessment literacy. A total of 103 EFL educators from three language universities: Uzbekistan state university of world languages, Samarkand state institute of foreign languages and Nukus state pedagogical institute named after Ajiniyaz, were involved in the study. The result showed that the gap between subject matter knowledge and pedagogy of assessment can be bridged by aligning pre-service and in-service teacher programs. The consistency in developing teachers’ language assessment competence can be reached if conducting a clear and well-developed assessment course in practicing classroom assessment.
1. Avanesov, V.S. (2000). The history of the test development. Мoscow.
2. Boopathiraj, C., Dr. Chellamani, K. (2013). Analysis of test items on difficulty level and discrimination index in the test for research in education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Research, 2(2).
3. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1-47.
4. Cattel, J. Mc. K. (1890). Mental tests and measurement. Mind, 373-380.
5. Csenzova, G.Y. (1999). Teachers’ assessment literacy. Pedagogical society of Russia. Мoscow. 46p.
6. Deirdre, D. (2013). Teaching beyond the test: A method for Designing Test-Preparation Classes. English Teaching Forum (4, pp. 20-27). USA.
7. Fulcher, G. Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113-132.
8. Harding, L., & Kremmel, B. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy and professional development. In Tsagari, D. & Banerjee, J. (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment; Volume 12 of handbooks on applied linguistics (pp. 413-428). Berlin, Germany; Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. (chapter doi). 48. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-027
9. Herrera, L., & Macias, D. (2015). A call for language assessment literacy in the education and development of teachers of English as a foreign language. Applied Linguistic, 17(2), 305 p.
10. Ken, K. et al. (2018). Developing the assessment literacy of teachers in Chinese language classroom: A focus on assessment task design. Language teaching Research, 22(3), 264- 288.
11. Malone, M.E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30(3), 329-344.
12. Marzano, R.J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13. Muradkasimova, K. (2020). Enhancing Assessment Procedure by Applying Effective Tips. Inter Conference.
14. Newfields, T. (2006). Teacher development and assessment literacy, Authentic Communication. Proceedings of the 5th Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference. Shizuoka, Japan. Tokai University College of Marine Science. 48 -73.
15. Olmezer-Ozturk, E., & Belgin, A. (2018) Toward measuring language teachers’ assessment knowledge: development and validation of Language assessment Knowledge Scale (LAKS). Language Testing in Asia, 1-15.
16. Pill, J., & Harding, L. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from parliamentary inquiry. Langauge Testing, 30(3), 381-402.
17. Scarino, A. (2013). Language Assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language Testing, 30(3), 309- 327.
18. Scott, A.D. (2013). Identifying areas for high school teacher development: A study of assessment literacy in central Bucks School District. Dissertation.
19. Sellan, R. (2017). Developing assessment literacy in Singapore; How teachers broaden English language learning by expanding assessment constructs. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1).
20. Stiggins, R.J. (1991). Assessment Literacy. The Phi Delta Kapan, 72(7), 534-539.
21. Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21-36.
22. Tierney, R.D. (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13, 239-264.
23. Tim McNamara. (2000). Language Testing. Oxford University Press. 140 p.
24. Yoneda, M. (2012). Designing Assessment Tools; The Principles of Language Assessment. Mukogawa Women’s University. Humanities and Social Sciencies, 41-49.
"THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING TEACHERS' ASSESSMENT LITERACY COMPETENCE,"
Philology Matters: Vol. 2021
, Article 7.
Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2021/iss1/7