The article provides an in-depth analysis of the history of the origin of the term satire types of satire, definitions of the term satire in encyclopedias and scientific dictionaries. Representatives of satire in Russian, English and Uzbek literature are also mentioned. The article also includes opinions of famous scholars on satire, as well as their translation into Uzbek.
The genre of satire has evolved since ancient times and covered almost all types of fiction. The satirist writers exposed the social events of the period in which they lived with humor and satire. They put the final conclusion on their works to readers themselves. Satirical works delight readers, they are immortal.
In ancient Roman literature, Quintus Horace Flaccus, Detsim Junior Juvenile, Menippus Gadarsky elevated satire, while in English literature Daniel Defoe, Jonathan Swift, in American literature Mark Twain left a deep imprint in the hearts of readers with their works.
In Russian literature, the works of Nikolai Gogol, Mikhail Saltikov-Shchedrin, Mikhail Zoshchenko further flourished the genre of satire. In Uzbek literature, the first examples of satire appeared in folklore, and later flourished in written literature. In the genre of satire, our ancestors Alisher Navoi, Turdi, Makhmur, Gulkhani, Haziq, Muqimi, Zavkiy created. Hamza Hakimzoda Niyazi, Abdulla Kodiri, Ghazi Yunus, Sofizoda, Gafrur Gulam, Abdulla Kahhor, Said Ahmad, Nemat Aminov, Sadulla Siyoev also contributed the further development of satire.
The purpose of the article is to analyze the status of satire as a genre, the system of artistic interpretation of satirical works, the specific artistic expression of the moral and philosophical worldview and the stages of formation and development of this genre, its dynamics and its new forms, comparativehistorical, comparative-typological analysis.
Theoretical methods were used: comparative analysis, synthesis, comparative induction, deduction, and comparative-historical analysis.
In results the genesis of the satire genre, the historical, theoretical and poetic foundations of the satire genre and the stages of its formation were established. The most common types of satire were analyzed.
1. The folklore roots of satire and the peculiarities of satirical images in oral folklore have been identified.
2. The problem of the genesis of the genre of satire was considered on the basis of world artistic-philosophical, socio-cultural thinking.
3. The problem of the genre of satire is covered in the comparative literary aspect.
4. The peculiarities of the classification and types of the genre of satire were determined.
1. Abrams, M.H. (1999). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston: Cornell University Press. 366 p.
2. Anna, R.S.T., Winda, S.S., Citra, A.P., Morada, T., & Rita, H. (2020, April). Lexical and Contextual Meanings in Children Storybook: A Stylistic Approach. International journal of scientific & technology research, 9(04), ISSN 2277-8616 3479.
3. Baldick, Ch. (2001). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 280 p.
4. Boboyev, T. (2002). Fundamentals of Literary Criticism. Tashkent. 460 p.
5. Brendan, G. (1949). Ice. New York. 156 p.
6. Cuddon, J.A. (1999). The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. London: Penguin books. 991 p.
7. Evelyn, W. (2001). Put Out More Flags. London. 400 p.
8. Fletcher, M.D. (1987). Contemporary Political Satire: Narrative Strategies in the Post- Modern Context. Maryland: Lanham. 230 p.
9. Galsworthy, J. (1931). The Creation of Characters in Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 345 p.
10. Jane, E.N. (1972). Character development in the novels of Evelyn Waugh. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 5, 146-154.
11. Johnson, E. (1945). The Nature and Value of Satire. New York. 378 p.
12. Joseph, T. (1951). Satirical Methods in Eight Novels of Evelyn Waugh. Master's Theses. Loyola University Chicago press. Chicago. 1126 p.
13. Khalliyeva, G. (2020). Comparative literature. Classical words. Tashkent. 15 p.
14. Khudoiberdiyev, E. (2003). Introduction to Literary criticism. Tashkent: NSIM. 476 p.
15. Maryland, M.D. (1987). Contemporary Political Satire: Narrative Strategies in the Post- Modern Context. Fletcher, Lanham. 230 p.
16. Michael, R., Millan, M. (2007). Essential dictionary for learners of English. Oxford: 861 p.
17. Palmeri, F. (1990). Satire in Narrative. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18. Park, C. (2016) Carnivalism and Engaging Journalism in the Current-Affairs Podcasts in South Korea. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 75-88. https//:doi.org/10.4236/ ajc.2016.43008.
19. Peter, Ch., & Roger, F. (2006). The Routledge Dictionary of Literary Terms. New York. 211 p.
20. Podoprigora, S.Ya., & Podoprigora, A.S. (2013). Philosophical Dictionary, 382-383.
21. Saltikov, Sh.M. (1952). Literature and Art. Moscow. 345 p.
22. The Acharnians / Aristophanes. (1969). Trans. Douglass Parker. Michigan: Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press. 387 p.
23. The Power of Ridicule: An Analysis of Satire Megan Le Bouef. (2007). Senior Honors Projects. 63 p.
24. Tompson, А.B., & Angeles, L. (1948). The Dry Mock. 278 p.
25. Wild Pleasing Fables. Times Literary Supplement. (1949). 824 p.
26. Wilder, A.N. The Critical Heritage. Article. http://books.google.ru.
27. Wilson, E. (1950). Classics and commercials. New York.
28. Worchester, D. (1940). The Art of Satire. Cambridge: Mass. 243 p.
33. saviya.uz / creation / literature /the magic of satire / -internet site
"ORIGIN OF THE TERM "SATIRE" IN FICTION,"
Philology Matters: Vol. 2021
, Article 10.
Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2021/iss1/10