•  
  •  
 

Philology Matters

Abstract

This article reflects the experience of a comprehensive systematic and phenomenological study of computer and the Internet jargon, which is now widely recognized as an important tool and subject. One of the unique features of computer and the Internet terminology is the emergence of computer jargon specific to their users. After all, special vocabulary is only used in industry and is self-explanatory. This research is devoted to the study of the sources of computer and the Internet jargon in Uzbek and English.
In fact, the language of science and technology emerges and develops on the basis of the general literary language. The structure of the language of the science and technology obeys the rules of the language, the main types of language units are expressed in it. The relationship between the language of the science and technology and the general literary language has been analyzed by the author in the way of analyzing the jargons of the computer and the Internet systematically. That is to say, it has been undertaken in the examples of the literary language relations. The literary language and the language of the science and technology practically use the commonly-used words and scientific lexical units. The terminological lexical units are also connected with the general literary language, which means that it gives the chance of representing and naming newly appeared notions. Practical means of creating the terms are determined in the process as well. Meanwhile, professional jargons are also enriched by means of non-professionally-used terminological lexical units in its turn.
Before analyzing the linguistic features of computer and the Internet jargon, we considered it necessary to analyze the terms/terminology, computer and the Internet terms, theoretical views given to them by linguists and experts in this field. In the modern English and Uzbek languages jargons are widely used in terms of many concepts related to computer and the Internet activities.

First Page

98

Last Page

114

DOI

10.36078/987654465

References

1. Abdullayeva Sh.N. Financial and economic terms used in the field of Treasury (based on the material of the Uzbek language) // Culturology, Philology, art history: actual problems of modern science: collection of articles on mater. VII international scientific and practical conference No. 2 (6). – Novosibirsk: Sibak, 2018.
2. Alexandrov O.A., Bogoslovskaya Z.M., Shchitova O. G., etc. Variation in language and related phenomena: a monograph // edited by Z. M. Bogoslovskaya. – Tomsk: TPU, 2015.
3. Alekseeva L.M. Problems of term and term formation. – Perm: PU, 1998.
4. Atabekova A.A. Linguistic design of Web pages (comparative analysis of the language design of English-and Russian-language Web pages). – M.: PFUR, 2003.
5. Bakhtin M.M. Collected works: in 7 t. T. 5. Working 1940s – early 1960s // ed: S. G. Bocharov, L. A. Gogotishvili, Institute of world lit. – M., 1997.
6. Belikov V.I., Krysin L.P. Sociolinguistics: Textbook for universities. – M.: Russian state humanitarian University, 2001.
7. Glazyrina A.I. Computer sublanguage: terms, jargon, professionalism. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk state University. 2013. № 24 (315). Philology. Art criticism. Issue 82.
8. Golovanova E.I. German borrowings in mining terminology of the Urals (XVIII century) // Humanitarian vector. Series: Pedagogy, psychology. – 2011. – № 4.
9. Golovanova E.I. Typology of professional communication units: cognitive and pragmatic aspect // Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk state University. – 2008. – № 9. 10. Golovanova E.I. Category of a professional figure in the dynamic space of language (linguocognitive analysis): dis. doctor of Phil. Sciences. – Chelyabinsk, 2004.
11. Gorbunova N.N. At the origins of the management term system // Materials of the scientificpractical seminar's. – Pyatigorsk, 2003.
12. Grinev-Grinevich S.V. Terminovedenie: Manual for students higher studies'. 13.
13. Danilenko V.P. On the main linguistic requirements for standardized terms // Semiotic problems of languages of science, terminology and Informatics. – Moscow: MSU, 1971.
14. Elistratov A.A. On the problem of stylistic stratification of sports vocabulary // Philological science. Questions of theory and practice. – 2010. – № 1 (5).
15. Izmailova M.S. Actual problems of development and functioning of Internet terminology in the German language. Diss. Cand. of Philol. Sciences. – Omsk, 2005.
16. Komarova, Z.I. Structure of a special word and its lexicographic description. – Sverdlovsk, 1991.
17. Komleva I.L. Principles of formation of Russian computer terminology: dis. PhD. – M., 2006.
18. Korovushkin V.P. Typologization of sociolects in English and Russian at the level of substandard lexical systems. – Ekaterinburg, 2007.
19. Qodirbekova D. English-Uzbek terminology of information and communication technologies and its lexicographic features. Dis. Cand. of Philol. Sciences. – T., 2017.
20. Likholitov P.V. Computer jargon // Russian speech. 1997. – №3.
21. Lobareva L.N. A modern take on professional language. https://research-journal.org/ category/languages/
22. Nikitina T.G. Explanatory dictionary of youth slang: Words that are not clear to adults. – M.: Astrel: AST, 2003.
23. Ozhegov S., Shvedova N.Yu. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. – M.: AZ. 1992.
24. Reformatsky A.A. Term as a member of the lexical system of the language // Problems of structural linguistics. – M., 1968.
25. Romanova G.S. On the question of terms in Spanish // Vestnik MGIMO. 2010. No. 2.
26. Russian language and speech culture: textbook for universities // L.A. Vvedenskaya, L.G. Pavlova, E.Yu. Kashaeva. – Rostov n /A, 2010.
27. Saidqodirova D.S. Linguistic study of Internet terms in English and Uzbek. Dis. PhD. – T., 2017.
28. Skrebnev Yu. M. Fundamentals of English language stylistics. – M., 2000.
29. Annotated dictionary of the Uzbek language. – T., 2006.
30. Chemist V.V. Poetics of low or vernacular as a cultural phenomenon. – St. Petersburg: Faculty of Philology of St. Petersburg State University, 2000.
31. Khodakova A.G. System semantics of the term (based on English-language Internet terms). Diss. Abstract of Philol. Sciences. – Tula, 2010.
32. Khojiev A. Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. – T.: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2002.
33. Chepelyuk V.V. Functional and stylistic features of texts of final documents of international meetings of 1970-1980: Diss. abstract of Cand. Philol. Sciences. – Kiev, 1992.
34. Shaposhnikov I. Web site with your own hands. –SPb: BHV−Saint-Petersburg, 2000. – P. 224.
35. Shchitova O.G. Functional-style migration of borrowings as one of the criteria for their assimilation in the recipient language // Bulletin of Tomsk state University – 2007. – № 294.
36. Erkinov S.E. System-functional features of linguistic units of the military profession (based on English material). PhD author. – Samarkand, 2020.
37. Drame A. Terminography and Lexicography: What is the difference? Retrieved from 2006.
38. Wills W. Fachsprache und Übersetzung // Terminologie als angewandte Sprachwissenschaft. München; New York; London; Paris, 1979.
39. http://nethash.ru/proishojdenie-professionalenoj-leksiki-kompeyuternij-jargon.html
40. https://www.textologia.ru/russkiy/kultura-rechi/professionalnaya-rech/ osnovnielingvisticheskie- cherti-specialnogo-yazika/887/?q=463&n=887

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.