The paper continues to analyze the language of international organizations, its development and importance of its correct understanding in the course of partners’ communication with different languages, which requires translators to be more attentive to avoid discrapencies and confusions while translating dialogues or presentations at some official meetings. The topicality of such research is obvious. Thus in the article the authors decided to discuss a very interesting phenomenon of buzzwords and ‘plastic’ words as a distinct class of words. For that, they reviewed key publications on development discourse and eleven characteristics of development buzzwords and plastic words were identified and discussed. An attempt was made at classification of development buzzwords into concepts and decorative elements. The international organizations with their activities try to help further promotion of world economies and improve the life of countries in need. Consistent studies of development terms and their deconstruction seem promising and, as a result, might contribute to better understanding and perception of buzzwords in the countries receiving a development assistance.
1. Poerksen, U. [Plastikworter. English]. Plastic words: the tyranny of a modular language. University Park, Pa. : Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995.
2. Schmid, H.-J. "Shell nouns in English – a personal roundup". Caplletra. Revista Internacional de Filologia, 2018, P. 64, 109-128
3. Cornwall, A. and Eade, D., eds (2010). Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. https://doi. org/10.3362/9781780440095
4. Cornwall, A. and Brock, K. What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’, Third World Quarterly, 26:7, 1043- 1060, 2005, DOI: 10.1080/01436590500235603
5. Sachs, W., ed. The Development Dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power-2nd-ed-2010 London; New York, N.Y. : Zed Books, 2010
6. Roth, J. and Franks, J. Development Jargon as Order Words. Development in Practice, 7 (3): 1997, P. 280-283.
7. Mintzberg, H. and Srinivas, N. (2010). Juxtaposing Doers and Helpers in Development. Community Development Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 39-57, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1528289 or http://dx.doi.org/bsp002
8. Harrison, B. Kiva: An Analysis of Microfinance, NGOs and Development Discourses. Master’s Thesis, Anthropology, Carleton University, 2011.
9. Ziai, A. The discourse of ‘development’ and why the concept should be abandoned. Development in Practice 23(1), 2013, pp. 123–136; 132–133 DOI:
10.1080/09614524.20 13.752792 10. Mukhametdinova, TYu. Lexical Units with Diffuse Semantics in Political Texts of German Media. Political Linguistics. No 2 (80). 2020, pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.26170/pl20- 02-10
11. Stahel, AW. Oikonomy – The art of living and living well. Campins-BCN: Montseny-Spiral Edition. 2020, ISBN-13: 978-84-09-20415-1
Muratova, Elmira Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate professor, Department of Linguistics and Literature Critical Studies, and Eolian, Victoria Teacher, Department of Theoretical Aspects of the English Language
"DEVELOPMENT BUZZWORDS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS,"
Philology Matters: Vol. 2020
, Article 5.
DOI: 10. 36078/987654446
Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2020/iss3/5