•  
  •  
 

Philology Matters

Abstract

Each language event affects a specific lan-guage level. Euphemism serves to soften harshwords or soften the name of a taboo.
Genderology is the direction that explores therelationships of speech, culture, social status, be-havior, position, psychological characteristics ofhuman biology, including speech. The speech ofmen and women has specific features that are ob-served in the phonetic, lexicological and syntacticsections of the language.
The article discusses the role and functioning of language levels (phonological, lexical, morphological, syntactic and methodological), and gender euphems can be expressed not only by verbal and kinetic means, but also by certain grammatical forms, vocabulary, text simplicity, even audio.
Nevertheless, the results show that we are far from understanding gender evolution as part of a certain level of the language system, but we cannot overcome the language roles and partnerships in their implementation. Undoubtedly, men and women have their own characteristics that affect a particular system.
The main aspect of linguistic stereotypes is the difference between male and female speeches, and there is no difference in the use of nonverbal tactics in the expression of these two sexes. At the same time, the euphemic meaning is also expressed through non-zero means, and the most important of these tools is silence. By default, quiet silence in the letter is expressed by ellipsis. Silence plays a key role in the Uzbek cultureof communication. Silence is a verbal drive that broadly represents meaning. It is used not only as a euphemism, but also for other purposes of communication. (respect, honor, dignity, etc.).
The article concludes that the lexical, morphological and syntactic part of the language plays an important role in the implementation of gende reuphemisms in the Uzbek language. Also, gender evolution is a language system. At the same time, in euphemisms, the role of linguistic and insignificant factors in the evolution of sex is determined.

First Page

89

Last Page

97

DOI

10.36078/987654386

References

1.Abdurahmanov H., Mahmudov N. The aesthetics of words. – Tashkent: Ilm publishing house of the Uzbek SSR, 1981. – p.49.
2. Kochetova D.A. Nonverbal communication as a means of depicting gender in the emotions of female characters (On the material of the novel of John Steinback “Grapes of wrath ”) [elektron resurs]//http://elar.urfu.ru/bitre/10995/47168/1/9/9–8295-0519-6_10.pdf6.
3. Narojnaya V.D. Nonverbal language of males and females as the concept of gender research: Aspects of intercultural communication[elektron resource] /https://www.google.com
4. Pak L.E., Kositsina I.B. Gender features of the use of lexical units // Successes of modern sciences. – 2013. – No 8. – S. 93-93; [elektron resurs] URL:http://www.natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/viewid=32720 (data obrasheniya: 12.03.2019).
5. Pushkareva N.L. Gender studies of the birth, becoming methods and perspectives in the systemof historical sciences.//Woman. Gender. culture.- M., 1999.- S. 15-34.
6. Troitskaya O.G. Gender aspect of phonetic research [elektron resource] //http://main.isuct.ru/files/konf/shcherba/trud/troickaya.htm
7. Zemskaya E. A., Kitaygorodskaya M. A., Rozanova N. N. Essentials of male and female speech// Russian and its function / Pod red. E. A. Zemskoy i D. N. Shmeleva. M., 1993. S. 90-136.
8. [elektron resource] //https://uz.m.wikipedia.org
9. Mahmudov N. Language. – Tashkent: Writer, 1998. – B. 5. – 40 p.
10. Muminov S. The socio-linguistic features of the Uzbek communication behavior // Filol. fan d-ri ... diss. avtoref – Tashkent, 2000. – B.34.
11. Omonturdiev A.J. Functional features of carbohydrates: Filol. science. Candidate ... diss. – T.,1997. – B.196.
12. Omonturdiev A.J. Professional speech spinal cord. – Tashkent: Fan, 2006.
13. Qodirova X.B. Abdollahi Kadyri's Efficacy of Euphemism and Diphthmism: Candidate of Philological Sciences ... diss. – Tashkent, 2012. – B.15.
14. Kirillina.A.V.Gender research in linguistic discipline//Gender and language/Pod red.A.V.Krillina’s.2005.p155.
15. Nurmonov.A. About paralinguistic mediums of Uzbek language. Andijan.1990.Saidkhonov.M.Non-verbal mediums and their explanation in Uzbek.Diss.ref. to get PhD.Tashkent.1993.
16. Vildanova G.A. Gender aspect of euphemization (on the material of the English language) // Thesis for a degree candidate of philological sciences. – Birsk, 2008.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.