The aim of the paper is to analyze the study of the spread of the English language as global language, its place in communicative relations invarious socio-economic spheres, sociolinguistic and pragmatic status of English. The article addresses the study of sociolinguistic and pragmatic features of internationalization of the English language.
Various interpretations are expressed in the scientific schools of world linguistics about the social role of the English language, which managed to get the status of an international language, but in these interpretations they remain spiritualized, being reflected in the philosophical ideas and points of view of different authors. However, the distinctive aspects of the social status of a language on the territories of different countries and their linguistic indicators are overlooked. It becomes more difficult to comment on the factors that ensure the interrelation of the language, as a phenomenon developing in an objective way and under the controlof synergetic patterns, with thinking. Scientific research on sociolinguistic and pragmatic aspects of the English language is being elaborated in the leading scientific centers and higher educational institutions of the world, including: Cambridge University (England); Oxford University (England);University of Illinois (USA), Free University of Berlin (Germany); University of Warsaw (Poland),Aoyama Gakuin University (Japan), Moscow State University (Russia), Linguistic Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia).
1.Abduazizov A. Tilshunoslik nazariyasiga kirish. – T.: “Sharq”, 2010. – 176 b.
2.Baumgardner R. South Asian English.- Urbana, I L.: University of Chicago Press, 1996. –P.96-140.
3.Bolton K. The Sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English //World Englishes, 2000.-vol. 19 (3). – P. 265-86.
4.Collombat I. Le discours image en vulgarisation Scientifique: etude comparee de Françaiset anglais. – Paris, 2003.
5.Deterding D.Singapore English.-Edinburgh: EUP, 2007. – 273 p.
6.Hudson R. Sociolinguistics. – Cambridge: CUP, 2004. – 279 p.
7.Hymes D, Foundations of Sociolinguistics. – Philadelphia: University of PennsylvaniaPress, 1974. – Р. 167-191.
8.Ide S. The background of Japanese sociolinguistics // Journal of pragmatics, 1986.-vol.
10,No.3. – Р.281-286.9.Jenkins J. English as a Lingua Franca in the International University. – L.: Routledge,2013. – 296 p.10.Kachru B. World Englishes: approaches, issues and resources// Language Teaching, 1992.-vol.25(1). – P. 1-14.
11.Kachru B.B. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism. The English language in outer circle. In: Qurk R. and Widdowson H. (eds.). English in the World: Teaching andlearning the language and literatures. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. – P.11-30.
12.Kirkpatrick A. Which model of English: native-speaker, nativized or lingua franca? //English in the World. – L., 2006. – P. 71-83.
13.Labov W. Principles of Linguistic Change. – Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. – Р. 123.
14.Lawrence C. The Korean English linguistic landscape//World Englishes, 2012. – Vol. 31(1). – P.70-92.
15.Löffler H. Germanistische Soziolinguistik. – Berlin, 1994. – 255 S.
16.Sprachsituation und Sprachkultur im internationalen Vergleich: aktuelle Sprachprobleme in Europa. – Frankfurt a. M., 1995. – 291 s.
17.M.Yu Interlinguistic variation in Second Language speech Act Bahavour // The ModernLanguage Journal, 2004. Vol. 88. – Р. 102-119.
18.Melnyk Y. The influence of English on Russian and Ukrainian // Rice University electronic magazine, 2002. http: // www.topics-mag.com/ globalization /lang. ukranian. htm.
19.Modaino M. International English in the global village // English Today, 1999. – Vol. 15(2). – P. 22-34.
20.Rickford J.R. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics //
Rakhimov, Ganisher Doctor of philological sciences, associate professor
"SHORT REVIEW OF THE SOCIOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF GLOBAL ENGLISH,"
Philology Matters: Vol. 2019
, Article 20.
Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2019/iss4/20