The article is devoted to the scientific and theoretical analysis of the devices actualizing the content of the speech statements, since any speaker tries to fulfill his/her speech motions appropriately to the expected result.The practice of reaching a pragmatic effect in the communication, at the time of fulfilling the speech statements with special emphasis and precision, may have some specific nuances. In such process the speaker creates a speech statement delivering the information directly to the listener. This speech statement is neither lexical or grammatical phenomenon, but a pragmatic unit.
Social role of interlocutors is of concern in choosing particular pragmatic-modal variant of the speech structure. The very process urges the following: 1) the characteristics of the person from birth (sex, nationality, nation); 2) social status; 3) position in a certain situation.
1.Choriev A. Human philosophy. -T .: 2007. -416 b.
2.Haverkate H. Impositive Sentences in Spanish. Theory and Description in Linguistic Pragmatics. -American .: 1999. -194 p.
3.Krause M. Epistemische Modalitat: Zur Interaction lexikalisher und prosodischer Marker. Weisbaden: 2007. S.250.
4.Boymirzaeva S. Categories that form the communicative-pragmatic content of the text inUzbek. Auto reference. -T., 2017. -86b.
5.Lyons J. Semantics. -L., Melbourne: V. 1 -1997. -371 p.
6.Aijmer K. Evidence and the Declarative Sentence. -Stockholm: -1990. -142 p.
7.Grice G. Logic and verbal communication. New in foreign linguistics. –M .: Progress,1985. –F 194-200.
8.Wolf EM Functional semantics of evaluation. –M .: 1985. -228 p.
9.Belyaeva E.I. Modality in various types of speech acts. -1987. -with. 64-69.
10.Wierzbicka A. English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. –Sydney .: 1987. -397 p.
11.Nuyts J. Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmaticapproach. - Amsterdam: 2001.
12.Starikova E.N. Semantic syntax problems. –K .: Vishcha school, 1985. -122 p.
13.Traugott E. Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case ofpromise and threaten. Modality in Germanic Languages. –Berlin: 1997. - 185-210 p.
Kholmatovа, Vazira Researcher
"THE MEANS OF REVEALING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SPEECH ACTS,"
Philology Matters: Vol. 2019
, Article 60.
Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2019/iss3/60