The article is devoted to the scientific and theoretical analysis of the devices actualizing the content of the speech statements, since any speaker tries to fulfill his/her speech motions appropriately to the expected result.The practice of reach-ing a pragmatic effect in the communication, at the time of fulfilling the speech statements with special emphasis and precision, may have some specific nuances. In such process the speaker creates a speech statement delivering the information directly to the listener. This speech statement is neither lexical or grammatical phenomenon, buta pragmatic unit.
Social role of interlocutors is of concern in choosing particular pragmatic-modal variant of the speech structure. The very process urges the following: 1) the characteristics of the person from birth (sex, nationality, nation); 2) social status; 3) position in a certain situation.
1.Choriev A. Human philosophy. -T .: 2007. -416 b.
2.Haverkate H. Impositive Sentences in Spanish. Theory and Description in Linguistic Pragmatics. -American .: 1999. -194 p.
3.Krause M. Epistemische Modalitat: Zur Interaction lexikalisher und prosodischer Marker. Weisbaden: 2007. S.250.
4.Boymirzaeva S. Categories that form the communicative-pragmatic content of the text inUzbek. Auto reference. -T., 2017. -86b.
5.Lyons J. Semantics. -L., Melbourne: V. 1 -1997. -371 p.
6.Aijmer K. Evidence and the Declarative Sentence. -Stockholm: -1990. -142 p.
7.Grice G. Logic and verbal communication. New in foreign linguistics. –M .: Progress,1985. –F 194-200.
8.Wolf EM Functional semantics of evaluation. –M .: 1985. -228 p.
9.Belyaeva E.I. Modality in various types of speech acts. -1987. -with. 64-69.
10.Wierzbicka A. English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. –Sydney .: 1987. -397 p.
11.Nuyts J. Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmaticapproach. - Amsterdam: 2001.
12.Starikova E.N. Semantic syntax problems. –K .: Vishcha school, 1985. -122 p.
13.Traugott E. Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case ofpromise and threaten. Modality in Germanic Languages. –Berlin: 1997. - 185-210 p.
Kholmatovа, Vazira Researcher
"THE MEANS OF REVEALING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SPEECH ACTS,"
Philology Matters: Vol. 2019
, Article 60.
Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/philolm/vol2019/iss3/60