•  
  •  
 

Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University

Abstract

The article discusses the functional potential and the multiplicity of the word - formation structure of temporal adjectives of the modern Russian language, forming a closed semantic microsystem, the units of which are frequencies in speech practice and had flexible derivational and semantic structures. When choosing the object of study, the authors proceeded from the position that the main task of linguistics is the description of language signs, and the task of semantics is the selection and analysis of the meanings of these signs. The novelty of the work carried out is that its authors, using modern research technologies, established the specific nature of derivational relations among the members of the selected micro system, a special mechanism for varying their semantics in the text. The working hypothesis of the study was that, despite the stable nature of the same “time” in the semantic structure of lexems in the syntagmatic series, other non-temporal qualitative notations appear and derivational motivational relations change. We used productive methods for analyzing the semantic of words: the opposition method, the substitution method, distribution and transformational analysis. The results of the study can be taken into account in the fundamental development of the theory of nomination and in lexicographic practice.

First Page

267

Last Page

274

References

1. BAS – ‚Slovar sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazka‛ v 17-ti tomax. M., 1950-1965; MAS – ‚Slovar russkogo yazka‛ v 4-x tomax. M., 1957- 1961; TSU – ‚Tolkovy slovar russkogo yazka‛ pod red. D.N. Ushakova. M., 1934-1940; SO -‛Slovar russkogo yazka‛ S.I. Ojegova. M., 1987. 2. V dannom kontekste transformachiya ponimaetsya lish kak preobrazovanie vrajeniya. 3. Apresyan Yu.D. Leksisheskaya semantika. M., 1974. 4. Arutyunova N.D. Sintaksis. // Obshee yazkoznanie. Vnutrennyaya struktura yazka. «Nauka». M., 1972. 5. Vinogradov V,V, Russkiy yazk. M., 1972. 6. Karashuk V.A. Temporalne prilagatelne sovremennogo russkogo yazka. Tashkent, 1978. 7. Kim L.L., Shirina L.M. Iz nablyudeniy nad prirodoy metaforizachii imjn prilagatelnx i semantisheskoy dvuplanovostyu metaforizovannx prilagatelnx vkusooboznasheniya v sovremennom russkom yazke. // Vopros russkogo yazkoznaniya. / Naushne trud. TashGU, vp. 390, Tashkent, 1971.8. Kim L.L. Prilagatelne v sostave nominativnx edinich sovremennogo russkogo yazka. // Vopros russkogo i obshego yazkoznaniya. / Sb. naushnx trudov, №501. Tashkent, 1976. 9. Kim L.L. Xarakter semantisheskogo tojdestva otad'ektivnogo nareshiya na – O i proizvodyashego kashestvennogo prilagatelnogo v sovremennom russkom yazke. // Aktualne problem russkogo slovoobrazovaniya. Ch. II, Tashkent, 1976. 10. Kurilovish Ye. Zametki o znashenii slova. // Osherki po lingvistike. M., 1962. 11. Landsman I.M. Prochess okashestvleniya otsubstantivnx otnositelnx prilagatelnx v russkom yazke. AKD, Tashkent, 1967. 12. Matezius V. O sistemnom grammatisheskom analize. / O tak nazvaemom aktualnom shlenenii predlojeniya. «Prajskiy lingvistisheskiy krujok». M., 1967. 13. Ufimcheva A.A. Tip slovesnx znakov. M., 1974.

Erratum

???????

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.