•  
  •  
 

Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University

Abstract

This article discusses the comparative analysis of the Latin Christian calendar in other languages, which was written in the first part of the manuscript of the Codex Cumanicus, as well as the ideas and hypotheses of the Turkic scholars on the history of the dating of this manuscript.

First Page

268

Last Page

271

References

1. Argunşah M., Güner G. Codex Cumanicus. – Istanbul, 2015. – 1038 s. 2. Bang W. Über die Herkunft des Codex Cumanicus // Sitzungsberichte Preus. Akad.Wiss.Phil.-hist. Klasse.– 1913b. – 244-245 р. 3. Drüll D. Der Codex Cumanicus: Entstehung und Bedeutung. – Stuttgart, 1980. – 143 р. 4. Ligeti L. Prolegomena to the Codex Cumanicue // Codex Cumanicus / Ed. by Geza Kuun. – Budapestini, 1981. – 1-54 р. 5. Györfy G. Autor du Codex Cumanicus // Analecta Orientalia memoriae Alexandri Csoma de Körös dedicata. – Budapest, 1942. – T. 1. – 3-30 р. 6. http://www.qadriyat.uz/tarix/606-izhrij-taqvim

Erratum

???????

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.