•  
  •  
 

International Finance and Accounting

Abstract

The article examines the interaction of the country's GDP with the state budget in the short and long term, the impact of the macro-fiscal mechanism on the country's economic growth on the example of Uzbekistan. The aim of the study is to identify dynamic correlations between the country's state budget expenditures and the economic growth of the macro-fiscal mechanism in the short and long term, as well as to analyze the approximation or rate of return of GDP and the state budget to equilibrium during various macroeconomic shocks. and hesitation. The scientific novelties of the research are: - At the level of the national economy, empirical studies of economic growth and the state budget were assessed in a single grouping, the relationship of impact on GDP. - An assessment was made of the relationship between economic growth and state budget expenditures and the frequency of rebalancing as a result of various macroeconomic shocks and fluctuations. - Analyzed the interaction of GDP and state budget expenditures in the short and long term. - fully confirms that A. Wagner's law and J.M. Keynes's hypothesis are applicable to Uzbekistan.

References

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Oliy Majlisga Murojaatnomasi, 2017 yil 22 dekabr'. 2. M.Bekmurodov, Q.Quronboev, L.Tangriev “Harakatlar strategiyasi asosida jadal taraqqiyot va yangilanish sari”/ G‘ofur G‘ulom nomidagi NMIU, – Toshkent, 2017. – 92 bet. 3. Key V.O., The lack of budgetary theory. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 34, No. 6 (Dec., 1940), pp. 1137-1144. 4. Paul A. Samuelson, The pure theory of public expenditure. (Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954. Vol. 36, No.4, pp. 387-389). 5. Musgrave R.A., Musgrave P.B. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. – McGraw-Hill, inc. USA, 1973. 6. Harvey S. Rosen. Public Finance sixth edition. – McGraw-Hill, inc. USA, 2002. 7. Jahon banki ma'lumotlari asosida tuzilgan:World Bank, 2013 8. Ran R. «Optimal'niy razmer gosudarstva. Kakov on? - Belorusskaya gazeta, 17.08.1998, 9. The Budget, Taxation and Economic Growth. - US Congress, Growth and Prosperity Series, 1999 10. Veder P. Dvenadsat' mer gosudarstvennoy politiki v interesax ekonomicheskogo rosta. V kn: Puti ekonomicheskogo rosta. Mejdunarodniy opit, 2001 11. Beach W. Why Taxes Affect Economic Growth? Heritage Lectures 1998 12. Begg D., Wyplosz Ch. How Big a Government? 1999. 13. Abalkin L. «Logika ekonomicheskogo rosta» M. Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2002 // Gavrilenko Ye. «Kachestvo i kolichestvo» Ekspert, 2002 №21. 14. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Davlat statistika qo‘mitasi hamda O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Moliya vazirligi ma'lumotlari asosida ishlab chiqildi. 15. Ram, R. (1986). Government size and economic growth: A new framework and some evidence from cross-section and time-series data. The American economic review, 76(1), 191-203. 16. Holmes, J. M., & Hutton, P. A. (1990). On the casual relationship between government expenditures and national income. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87-95. 17. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of monetary economics, 23(2), 177-200. 18. Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., & Zou, H. F. (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of monetary economics, 37(2), 313-344. 19. Sáez, M. P., & García, S. A. (2006). Government spending and economic growth in the european union countries: an empirical approach. Saez, S. Garcia/University of Cantabria and University of Oviedo (Department of Economics). –2006. –11 р. 20. Taiwo, A. (2011). Government expenditure and economic development: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. 21. Grier, K. B., & Tullock, G. (1989). An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951–1980. Journal of monetary economics, 24(2), 259-276. 22. Landau, D. (1983). Government and economic growth in the less developed countries: an empirical study for 1960-1980. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35(1), 35-75. 23. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogeneous growth. Journal of political economy, 98(5, Part 2), S103-S125. 24. Ramayandi, A. (2003, July). Economic growth and government size in Indonesia: some lessons for the local authorities. In The 5th IRSA International Conference, Regional Development in The Era of Decentralization: Growth, Poverty, and Environment, Bandung. 25. Niloy, (2003). Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Disaggregated Analysis. University of Wisconsin Working Paper. 26. Hsieh, E., & Lai, K. S. (1994). Government spending and economic growth: The G-7 experience. Applied Economics, 26(5), 535-542. 27. Terasawa, K. L., & Gates, W. R. (1998). Relationships between government size and economic growth: Japan's government reforms and evidence from OECD. International public management journal, 1(2), 195-223. 28. Islam, A., & Nazemzadeh, A. (2001). Causal Relationship between Government Size and Economic Development: An Empirical Study of the US. Southwestern Economic Review, 28, 75-88. 29. Yamak, N., & Küçükkale, Y. (1997). Türkiye''de Kamu Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 12(131), 5-15. 30. Arpaia, A., & Turrini, A. (2007). Government expenditure and economic growth in the EU: long-run tendencies and short-term adjustment. Available at SSRN 2004461. 31. Kolluri, B. R., Panik, M. J., & Wahab, M. S. (2000). Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries. Applied Economics, 32(8), 1059-1068. 32. Omoshoro-Jones, O. S. (2016). A Cointegration and Causality Test on Government Expenditure–Economic Growth Nexus: Empirical Evidence from a South African Province. 33. Bagdigen, M., & Cetintas, H. (2004). Causality between public expenditure and economic growth: The Turkish case. Journal of Economic and Social research, 6(1), 53-72. 34. Nyamongo, M. E., Sichei, M. M., & Schoeman, N. J. (2007). Government revenue and expenditure nexus in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10(2), 256-269. 35. Edrwash,D.M & AbdulQader, N. (2012),” Economic growth and trend of Algerian public spending: Some empirical evidences to Wagner’s law using the ARDL Bound Test Approach”, Journal of Economics & Management, No-11, pp 1-23. 36. Aslan, M. and Taşdemir M., (2009). Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration & Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking; Issue 12, pp. 14-25. 37. Abu-Eideh, O. M. (2015). Causality between public expenditure and GDP growth in Palestine: An econometric analysis of Wagner’s law. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 189-199. 38. Egbetunde, Tajudeen & Fasanya, Tajudeen,( 2013),” Public Expenditure and Economic Growth in Nigeria: Evidence from Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag Specification”, Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 79-92. 39. Afonso, A. and Rault,C., (2009). Bootstrap Panel Granger-Causality between Government Spending and Revenue in the EU. Economics Bulletin, 29(4), pp. 2542-2548. 40. Chang, T., & Chiang, G. (2009). Revisiting the Government Expenditure and GDP: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries Based On the Panel Data Approach. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 59(2): 165-172. 41. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller (1981). “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”. Econometrica49 (4): 1 42. Engle, Robert F. and Clive W. J. Granger (1987). “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”. Econometrica55: 251-276 43. Granger, Clive W. J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”. Econometrica 37: 424-438. 44. Jaén-García, M. (2018). Wagner's law: A Revision and a New Empirical Estimation. Hacienda Publica Espanola, (224), 13-35. 45. Cwik, T., & Wieland, V. (2011). Keynesian government spending multipliers and spillovers in the euro area. Economic Policy, 26(67), 493-549. 46. Bose, N., Haque, M. E., & Osborn, D. R. (2007). Public expenditure and economic growth: A disaggregated analysis for developing countries. The Manchester School, 75(5), 533-556. 47. Zaghini, A., & Lamartina, S. (2008). Increasing public expenditures: Wagner's Law in OECD countries. 48. Alexiou, C. (2009). Government spending and economic growth: Econometric evidence from the South Eastern Europe (SEE). Journal of Economic and social research, 11(1), 1. 49. Kumar, S. (2009). Further evidence on public spending and economic growth in East Asian countries. 50. Al-Fawwaz, T. M. (2016). The impact of government expenditures on economic growth in Jordan (1980-2013). International Business Research, 9(1), 99. 51. Srinivasan, P. (2013),” Causality between public expenditure and economic growth: The Case of India”, International Journal of Economics and Management, Vol 7. No 2. pp335-347.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.