•  
  •  
 

Scientific reports of Bukhara State University

Abstract

Introduction. The article is dedicated to the phonostylistic features of one of phonetic changes elision in English and Uzbek languages which occur in pronunciation. The connotative meanings conveyed with the omission of sound or syllables in the verbal root-stems of the compared languages are shown on the basis of well-grounded examples. The phonopragmatic aspects of the literary speech of elision are thoroughly analyzed and studied. The connotative meanings expressed in the case of syncope are also explained on the basis of evincive examples taken from English and Uzbek languages. Syncopic words and their making up the great number in English language, their providing poetic meter specific for rhythmic tone in the artistic image and its creating a sense of artistic impressionability in the reader are conceived in the article. Research methods. Among the language units there are also words that have undergone phonetic changes in pronunciation. From a phonostylistic point of view, the pronunciation of such words have additional, i.e. connotative meanings. Phonetically modified words are divided into two, that is, the increase and decrease of speech sound in the pronunciation of words. The phenomenon of so-called sound acquisition includes the phenomena of prosthesis, epenthesis, epithesis. The so-called sound omission includes aphaeresis, syncope, apocope, elision. Results and discussions. Connotative meanings occur in the pronunciation of words with the phenomenon of sound omission, such as aphaeresis, syncope, apocope, elision. The phonopragmatic phenomenon of syncope has been used not only in poetry but also in prose and drama. The phenomenon of apocope is characteristic of colloquial speech in both languages, revealing that they have a number of connotative meanings, such as love, caress, intimacy, diminution. The connotative meanings of the phenomenon elision in the comparative languages have been studied on the basis of examples taken from the fiction in both languages. Conclusion. Thus, the connotative meanings formed by the phenomenon of sound omission in the pronunciation of words are similar from point of variety and versatility. They express a number of connotative meanings in speech, such as brevity, excitement, rhythmic tone, rhyme adjustment, gentleness, passion.

First Page

45

Last Page

55

References

1. Axmanova O.S. Slovar lingvisticheskix terminov. “Sovetskaya entsiklopediya”. - Moskva, 1966. - 606 s.; Hojiev A. Lingvistik terminlarning izohli lug'ati. - Toshkent: “O'qituvchi”. 1985. - 144 b.

2. William Safire, "The Elision Fields." The New York Times Magazine, August 13, 1989. – 155 p.

3. Tej Raj Kansakar. "A Course in English Phonetics." - Orient Blackswan, 1998. – 54 p.

4. Daniel Jones, "English Pronouncing Dictionary", 17th ed. - Cambridge University Press, 2006, – 399 p.

5. Caroline Newton. Between-word processes in children with speech difficulties: Insights from a usage-based approach to phonology. Developmental Science, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College. - London. - 31 p.

6. Qilichev E. O'zbek tilining amaliy stilistikasi. - Toshkent: “O'qituvchi”, 1992. - 50.

7. https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Syncope_(phonology)

8. Trask R.L., A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. Routledge, 1996, – P. 68.

9. Michael Hammond, The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality-Theoretic Approach. Oxford University Press, 1999, – P. 17.

10. https://literarydevices.net › syncope

11. https://www.thoughtco.com/syncope-pronunciation-1692016

12. Haydarov A.A. Expression of connotative meaning in onomatopoeia // Scientific Reports of Bukhara State University. 2020. – №5(81). – P. 76-80.

13. Haydarov A.A. Navruzova N.H. Stylistic features of intonation // Scientific Reports of Bukhara State University. 2021. – №1(83). – P. 18-29.

14. Haydarov A.A. Navruzova N.H. Connotative meanings related to sound changes // International Journal for Innovative Engineering and Management Research. Volume 10, Issue 03. Impact factor 7/1. – P. 340-347.

15. Norova M.F. Connotative meanings in phonetic variants of verbal root-stems (as an example of the English and Uzbek languages) // Research & Development. EPRA International Online Journal. – India, 2020. – №10(5). – P. 358-362. (Impact Factor SJIF 7.001).

16. Haydarov Anvar Askarovich and Navruzova Nigina Hamidovna (2021) "STYLISTIC FEATURES OF INTONATION," Scientific reports of Bukhara State University: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 2. DOI: 10.52297/2181-1466/2021/5/1/2

17. Kakhkhorova, Gulrukh (2021) "OBJECTIVES OF PARTICLES IN THE UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES," Philology Matters: Vol. 2021 : Iss. 3 , Article 4.

18. 14. Kakhkhorova Gulrukh Shavkatovna (2021) "THE SKILLS OF UZBEK WRITERS USING PARTICLES IN ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS," Scientific reports of Bukhara State University: Vol. 5: Iss. 4, Article 8. DOI: 10.52297/2181-1466/2021/5/4/8

19. 15. Kakhkhorova Gulrukh Shavkatovna (2021) "THE ALLOCATION OF PARTICLES IN TRANSLATION DICTIONARIES AND WAYS TO EXPRESS THEM IN TRANSLATION," Scientific reports of Bukhara State University: Vol. 5: Iss. 2, Article 7.

20. 16. Kakhkharova Gulrukh Shavkatovna (2020) "PROBLEMS OF TRANSLATION OF PARTICLES IN THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES," Scientific reports of Bukhara State University: Vol. 4: Iss. 4, Article 6. DOI: 10.52297/2181-1466/2020/4/4/6

21. 17. Kaxxorova Gulrux Shavkatovna (2020) "SEMANTIC GROUPING OF PARTICLES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES," Scientific reports of Bukhara State University: Vol. 4: Iss. 3, Article 10. DOI: 10.52297/2181-1466/2020/4/3/2

22. 18. Khamidova M. PROBLEMS OF TRANSLATION OF NATURAL PHENOMENA IN UZBEK LANGUAGE //International Journal of World Languages. – 2021. – Т. 1. – №. 3.

23. 19. Khamidova Muborak (2021) "PROBLEMS OF TRANSLATION OF FRENCH AND UZBEK DEOPOETONYMS," Scientific reports of Bukhara State University: Vol. 5: Iss. 4, Article 5. DOI: 10.52297/2181-1466/2021/5/4/5

24. 20. Khamidova M., Usanova N. The ancient greek culture and uzbek folklore //ACADEMICIA: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL. – 2020. – Т. 10. – №. 12. – P. 975-978.

25. 21. Hamidova M.H. EXPRESSION OF DEOPOETONYMS IN TRADITIONAL FORMS AND STYLES //International journal of conference series on education and social sciences (Online).– 2021. – Т. 1. – №. 2.

26. 22. Khamidova M.K. WIND-RELATED ANEMONYMS AND METEONYMS IN FRENCH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES //Scientific reports of Bukhara State University. – 2020. – Т. 4. – №. 4. – P. 144-149.

27. 23. Sobirova Z., Mengliev B. SOME ISSUES RELATED TO THE TRANSFER OF ENGLISH TOURISM TERMS IN UZBEK LANGUAGE //Journal of Critical Reviews. – 2020. – Т. 7. – №. 15. – P. 2434-2440.

28. 24. Rakhimovna Z.S. VOCABULARY STUDY OF THE TOURISM TERMS IN THE UZBEK LANGUAGE //International Engineering Journal For Research & Development. – 2021. – Т. 6. – №. TITFL. – P. 275-281.

29. 25. Rakhimovna Z.S. STUDY OF THE TERMS OF TOURISM IN ENGLISH ON LEXICAL-SEMANTIC ASPECTS //International Engineering Journal For Research & Development. – 2021. – Т. 6. – №. TITFL. – P. 282-289.

Included in

Linguistics Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.