•  
  •  
 

Acta of Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent

Abstract

In this paper, it is given that comparative analysis of road pavement roughness specifications between Uzbekistan and Japan. Road roughness measurement methods and acceptance values in construction and maintenance were analyzed. Based on comparative analysis, we developed recommendations about pavement roughness measurement methods for road authority of Uzbekistan.

First Page

42

Last Page

45

References

1. ASTM. (2012), E867 Standard terminology relating to vehicle-pavement systems, American Society for Testing Materials. 2. Civil engineering construction management standards and standard values. March 2017 MLIT (in Japanese ) 3. “Technical Standards on Pavement Structure” Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) 2001 (in Japanese ). 4. Pavement Inspection Procedure . MLIT; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan. October 2016 5. Nippon Expressway Company Limited (NEXCO). Design Procedure First volume. Pavement construction and maintenance July 2012 (in Japanese ). 6. SHNK 3.06.03-08. Automobile roads. Norms of construction. Tashkent., 2007.- 137 p. 7. GOST 30412-96 Automobile roads and aerodromes Uneveness measurement methods for base courses and pavements. Moscow 1997 8. IKN 05-2011. Giedlines of road diagnosys and assessment. Tashkent, 2012. – 129 p.

Share

COinS